Wednesday, December 3, 2008

WHY ARE AIRSHIPS LARGELY IMMUNE TO MISSILE ATTACK?

Missiles are a large threat to airplanes, whether from large ground to air defense or launched from enemy fighter aircraft, to simple shoulder fired man portable missiles.

Airships don't have the same vulnerability.

RADAR..... Modern stealth airplanes are constructed with large amounts of carbon materials, are coated with radar absorbant materials, are shaped to reflect radar away from the emitting source, and bury engines and turbine blades inside the airplane to reduce their radar cross section. The result is an airplane that is difficult to detect.

Airships can be constructed entirely out of materials that do not reflect radar, not just portions of the airframe like airplanes. The size of the airship allows these same materials to be shaped into planes and reflecting surfaces that are many times more effective than can be employed in an airplanes' small wing or fuselage area. Thus, the airship has even greater ability to avoid reflecting radar back to emitter, despite the increased size of the airship.

Airships can carry, and fly successfully, with far greater weights than any airplane. This give the airship the ability to use far larger amounts of radar absorbant materials than an airplane can use. With the increased capacity to carry greater weights, airships can also use active radar supression technologies that airplanes simply cannot carry. The result is greater stealth capability.

Airplanes are limited in their shape by aerodynamic considerations....which is why the F-117 began as a very difficult shape to fly. Advanced computing has eliminated the need for the F-117s angular prism shapes. More subtle shaping, as in the F-22 is now possible. However, the airplane must still maintain the ability to create aerodynamic lift.

Airships have no need to produce aerodynamic lift. An airship can be shaped in any manner whatsoever, from cube to a model of Mickey Mouse. It is therefore easier to shape an airship so that it reflects radar at ANY angle, thus making the airship more stealthy than an airplane.

A properly designed and constructed airship is totally invisable to radar, in far greater frequency ranges than any airplane can be made......and is therefore immune to radar guided missile attack.

INFRA-RED: An infra-red missile is a threat to an airplane because it seeks out the hot exhaust of the engines and will explode to destroy the engine or damage the airplane.

Properly designed airships have no heat signature for infra-red missiles to lock on to. Engines can be buried inside the airship HUNDREDS of feet away from the outer surface of the airships' hull. The airship can use by-pass engines that mix colder ambient air with engine exhaust, without losing any flight ability.

Because airships fly at speeds that are lower than airplanes, or lower than the blades of a helicopter, there is much less heat generated as friction across airfoils that an infra-red seeker might be able to detect.

Unlike an airplane, an airship is held up in the air by its' helium, not by the thrust from engines. An airplane will crash when engines are destroyed, an airship will simply float in the air.

Properly designed airships are immune to infra-red missile attack.


"Shoot it Down!"
Nope. Can't do it.
If you think so, then you believe you can can shoot and kill a whale with a .22 It's just about the same.
There are accounts of "Goodyear blimps" landing after a day of flying; the guys get inside the envelope and see little stars shining through.......bullet holes. (yes, some idiots are always trying to plug a blimp)...why didn't the blimp come down? Because the pressure inside is to little to force the helium out, and because the blimp is to large.
During World War I, giant Zeppelins bombing London were strafed with machine guns down their entire 700' lengths from airplanes flying overhead. Until the introduction of tracer rounds which would set the hydrogen gas on fire......several stricken airships simply flew back over the English Channel and set down gradually onto the ground. They had to be destroyed afterwards by their crews.
Nope. Can't just simply "shoot it down".
Why not? Mostly because its just to damn big. Thousands of holes caused by ground fire might make it leak helium; but it has so much volume that it doesn't fall out of the sky. It flies on, miles from the intitial point of damage. If it is carrying sufficient ballast which can be jetisoned, it does that and keeps on operating despite the damage.
Second reason is that the helium is in multiple cells, (unlike a blimp, which is a single large balloon). Damage to a single cell, or even several, is unlikely to be enough to bring the airship down.,
A third reason is one that is never thought of......which is that the helium inside that is holding the airship up....only wants to go straight up. Holes in the sides of an airship caused by ground fire are completely not relevant. The helium will not travel DOWNWARDS toward a hole to leak out.
Missiles? Unlike an airplane, an airship does not rely upon engines to keep it in the air. It can lose engines completely; it will still fly. There are many reasons why airships are well protected against attacks by missiles; we'll discuss them at a later time.
For now, simply consider the size of the airship compared to the lethal radius of a missile warhead. It's like trying to blow up a football stadium with a hand grenade. Or, like trying to kill that whale with a .22
Nope. Can't be done. You cannot just "shoot down" a proper airship. And that is one reason why the Navy, Marines, Army, Air Force....all need AIRSHIPS!

Monday, November 24, 2008

Stealth Intercontinental Vertical Troop Transport and Offensive Platform

PMA-262LTARFI
Sources Sought
Synopsis:
Aug 29, 2008

The following information is provided to assist the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) in conducting market research to identify potential contractors to develop, test, integrate, produce, field and support Lighter Than Air (LTA) platforms/systems.

Strike Weapons and Unmanned Aviation (U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Persistent Maritime Unmanned Aircraft Systems)

Navy charter to explore LTA free flight technologies in support of Navy missions.

LTA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) (optionally manned) have the potential to provide persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance and Communications (ISRC) support as well as logistical support (manned) for tactical level maneuver/decisions and unit level low altitude air defense/force protection for Naval ships (multi-ship classes) and Marine Corps land forces.
may include multiple air vehicles, and support equipment with a 5,000 mi radius of action with transglobal range (2,000 mi radius of action) and outsized payloads measuring up to 500 tons.

These systems will support Naval missions such as building the Recognized Maritime Picture, Maritime Security Operations, Maritime Interdiction Operations, and support of Naval units operating from sea/shore in the global war on terrorism. The systems will also support Marine Corps missions making improved integration with ground schemes of maneuver.

NAVAIR LTA interests include but are not limited to the following: conventional airships, hybrid airships, free floating balloon systems, and other High Altitude LTA systems.

Additionally NAVAIR is interested in supportive LTA technologies to include but not limited to: buoyancy control systems, advanced/alternative propulsion/power generation systems, lightweight high strength envelope materials, vectored flight control systems, weather prediction/avoidance systems, lifting gas generation systems, unconventional landing schemes, ground handling, ship interface concepts, and LTA modeling/scaling methodologies.

The sensor version has aa. mission radius of 5000 nmb. 2500 lbs payload thresholdc. un-manned semi-autonomous with remote pilot take off and landingd. 16Kw power thresholde. 7 days loiter at mission radius at 20,000 ft MSL is desired threshold.

The logistics version would be manned and support for "drive on – drive off" cargo movement, operating from unprepared surfaces or from water (lakes, rivers open sea).a. mission radius of 1000 nm

optionally manned. up to 500 tons.

The aircraft must be able to take off and land from water, snow, sand, and from un-prepared fields

Naval Air Systems Command

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

SOMETHING IN THE AIR......

An aircraft that can fly to any location on Earth; without need of any airport to operate from.
It needs no runway; landing and taking off vertically from unprepared fields, from icefields, desert sands, heavy shrublands, from lakes, rivers; even from the surface of the ocean.
It has no range limitations.
It can fly over oceans, mountains, continents, or around the world.
It is slower than commercial jets; but faster than trucks, trains, or marine ships.
It can carry hundreds of passengers, or hundreds of tons of cargos.
It can do all this without using fuel at all.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

NEW NAVY SHIPS OF THE AIR

Hindenburg, Akron, Macon....all about 800' long, about 130' in diameter, all carried about 100 tons, at about 70mph, diesel fueled.

Modern Nimitz class aircraft carrier is about 1,100 feet long, 250 wide, about 40mph, nuclear fueled.

This is what the Navy needs:
Rigid shelled, amphibious airships.
600' long, 360' wide.
500 persons,
150-200mph,
solar powered.

fast. stealthy. over sea, over land.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

No blimps!

(sigh..and here we GO...)

No blimps, no blimps, no blimps, NO blimps, NO BLIMPS, NO!

No mooring masts.
No slow, big fat bags of helium
No ground crews handling line lines to land or take off.
No giant hangars.

No Blimps, (or zeppelin-like similar craft)

Aw, hells bells people.....
NO BLOODY BLOOMIN BLIMPS!

Monday, August 25, 2008

SOLAR POWERED FLIGHT QinetiQ

QinetiQ's ZEPHYR will eventually lead to larger aircraft that are solar powered. Very large rigid airships for the Navy are an ideal application.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

STEALTH

early 1980s', as part of training exercise, RAF jets were hunting for a blimp flying over London on a dark and rainy night. Couldn't find it. radar couldn't see it. Blimp sailed at about 1,000', directly OVER Buckingham Palace.

It's really pretty simple. the blimp is made of fabric covered with urethane. radar passes through it, just as it passes through a radome. (radome. hold that thought)

late 1980's, Lockheed Martin builds "Sea Shadow".......built much like an F-117, on a SWATH hull. Now, it´s still classified, but we can assume that it was constructed much like an F-117 as well, that is...with lots of carbon fiber, some interior faceting that causes electromagnetic waves to be absorbed or reflected in directions that minimize detection.
Fine. nice stealty craft, as ship go.

Ah....but what if it could FLY?

No wake. No sonar signature at all. Very little infra-red signature. built in the same manner, so still minimal radar detectable. bury the engines deep inside it and have no acoustic signature either. change from engines...to electric motors, same as quiet AIP submarines. except, this can move through the air at speeds several times faster than a surface ship.......and then, across land as well.

Is a stealthy airship a real possiblity? certainly. (remember the radome) and check back......in 1999, Lockheed Martin announced they had designed an airship ¨the size of two soccer fields¨ and shaped similar to the B-2 bomber.....

me....I think that P-791 is not really a POS...it´s just an expensive bit of ..............disinformation. cute!



Thursday, July 31, 2008

SHOOT IT DOWN!

Nope. Can't do it. If you think so, then you believe you can can shoot and kill a whale with a .22
It's just about the same.

There are accounts of "Goodyear blimps" landing after a day of flying; the guys get inside the envelope and see little stars shining through.......bullet holes. (yes, some idiots are always trying to plug a blimp)...why didn't the blimp come down? Because the pressure inside is to little to force the helium out, and because the blimp is to large.

During World War I, giant Zeppelins bombing London were strafed with machine guns down their entire 700' lengths from airplanes flying overhead. Until the introduction of tracer rounds which would set the hydrogen gas on fire......several stricken airships simply flew back over the English Channel and set down gradually onto the ground. They had to be destroyed afterwards by their crews.

Nope. Can't just simply "shoot it down". Why not?

Mostly because its just to damn big. Thousands of holes caused by ground fire might make it leak helium; but it has so much volume that it doesn't fall out of the sky. It flies on, miles from the intitial point of damage. If it is carrying sufficient ballast which can be jetisoned, it does that and keeps on operating despite the damage.

Second reason is that the helium is in multiple cells, (unlike a blimp, which is a single large balloon). Damage to a single cell, or even several, is unlikely to be enough to bring the airship down.,

A third reason is one that is never thought of......which is that the helium inside that is holding the airship up....only wants to go straight up. Holes in the sides of an airship caused by ground fire are completely not relevant. The helium will not travel DOWNWARDS toward a hole to leak out.

Missiles? Unlike an airplane, an airship does not rely upon engines to keep it in the air. It can lose engines completely; it will still fly.

There are many reasons why airships are well protected against attacks by missiles; we'll discuss them at a later time.

For now, simply consider the size of the airship compared to the lethal radius of a missile warhead. It's like trying to blow up a football stadium with a hand grenade. Or, like trying to kill that whale with a .22

Nope. Can't be done. You cannot just "shoot down" a proper airship.

And that is one reason why the Navy, Marines, Army, Air Force....all need AIRSHIPS!





MISCONCEPTIONS

Mention the word "airship" in concert with the word "military", and it is almost certain to get a raised eyebrow, a curt remark, a chuckle, a loud laugh......Why is this? Because "airship" has meant "blimp" for the last 60 years.

It's time to leave "blimp" behind, where it belongs.